{"id":48986,"date":"2015-03-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-03-30T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk\/press\/survey-findings-on-the-hksar-governments-popularity-in-march-2015released-by-hong-kong-institute-of-asia-pacific-studies-at-cuhk\/"},"modified":"2015-03-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2015-03-30T00:00:00","slug":"survey-findings-on-the-hksar-governments-popularity-in-march-2015released-by-hong-kong-institute-of-asia-pacific-studies-at-cuhk","status":"publish","type":"press","link":"https:\/\/www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk\/en\/press\/survey-findings-on-the-hksar-governments-popularity-in-march-2015released-by-hong-kong-institute-of-asia-pacific-studies-at-cuhk\/","title":{"rendered":"Survey Findings on the HKSAR Government\u2019s Popularity in March 2015Released by Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies at CUHK"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","tags":[],"class_list":["post-48986","press","type-press","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"title_alt":"","sub_title_alt":"","press_date":"20150330","keep":false,"details":"<p>A telephone survey was conducted from 25 to 28 March 2015 by Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong to study the popularity of the HKSAR Government for the month of March 2015.&nbsp; 704 respondents aged 18 or above were successfully interviewed, with a response rate of 44.1%.&nbsp; The sampling error is + or &ndash; 3.69% at a confidence level of 95%.&nbsp;<\/p><p><strong>Major findings are summarized as follows:<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p><p><strong>Satisfaction <\/strong><strong>towards<\/strong><strong> the HKSAR Government.<\/strong>&nbsp; According to the survey, while 44.6% of respondents expressed dissatisfaction towards the HKSAR Government, 19.3% said they were satisfied.&nbsp; 34.7% of 704 respondents answered &lsquo;in-between&rsquo;.&nbsp; The corresponding figures in February 2015 were 39.8%, 20.3%, and 38.6%.&nbsp; Results of March 2015 were not significantly different from those of the past month statistically.&nbsp;<\/p><p><strong>Rating of Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying.<\/strong>&nbsp; The current survey showed that the performance rating of Chief Executive (with a point scale ranging from 0 to 100 while 50 as a passing mark) stood at 41.7 in average and it was 42.1 last month, but the difference between February 2015 and March 2015 was found to have no statistical significance.&nbsp;<\/p><p><strong>Ratings of Three Secretaries. <\/strong>&nbsp;The ratings of Chief Secretary for Administration (Carrie Lam), Financial Secretary (John Tsang), and Secretary for Justice (Rimsky Yuen) in March 2015 were 54.3, 58.0, and 48.7 respectively.&nbsp; The corresponding figures in February 2015 were 54.3, 59.0, and 48.8. No statistically significant differences in the ratings were observed between February 2015 and March 2015.&nbsp;<\/p><p><strong>Overall Rating of the HKSAR Governing Team (including politically-appointed officials). <\/strong>&nbsp;The overall rating of the HKSAR governing team was 45.6 in March 2015 and 45.9 in February 2015.&nbsp; This could be interpreted as a stable rating as statistically the rating of March 2015 was not significantly different from that of February 2015.&nbsp;<\/p><p><strong>Trust in the HKSAR and the Central Governments.&nbsp; <\/strong>In March 2015, 25.6% of respondents showed trust in the HKSAR government and 37.1% expressed distrust; 35.9% answered &lsquo;in-between&rsquo;.&nbsp; The results of February 2015 were 22.6%, 34.1%, and 42.3% respectively.&nbsp; Concerning the level of trust in the Central Government in March 2015, while 25.5% said they trusted the Central Government, 38.7% answered the opposite; 32.2% said &lsquo;in-between&rsquo;.&nbsp; The respective figures in the previous month were 24.4%, 39.3%, and 32.3%. There were no statistically significant differences in trust towards the HKSAR and the Central Governments between February 2015 and March 2015.<\/p>","show_as_achievement":false,"achievement_category":[],"show_as_clarification":false,"show_as_announcement":false,"photos":null,"attachments":null,"video_source":null,"video_file":null,"add_play_button":false,"video_caption":"","show_migration":false,"original_id":"1998","photos_original":null,"attachments_original":[{"link":"5518e97a18b37.pdf","text":"Attachment (Chinese version only)"}]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/48986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/press"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/48986\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}